Compare / Qwen3.8-Max (0902) vs GPT-5.4 mini

Qwen3.8-Max (0902) vs GPT-5.4 mini

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3.8-Max (0902) Released 3 Aug 2026 · $2.00 in · $6.00 out
OpenAIGPT-5.4 mini Released 17 Mar 2026 · $0.75 in · $4.50 out
Qwen3.8-Max (0902) wins 161 too close to callGPT-5.4 mini wins 0

Of the 17 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs OpenAI, every model from both labs.

Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GPT-5.4 mini? The short answer

Pick Qwen3.8-Max (0902) if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 45.4 against 24.1). Pick GPT-5.4 mini if cost matters more: it costs 44% less per token.

  • GPT-5.4 mini is cheaper: $1.69 against $3.00 per million tokens, 44% less.
  • Qwen3.8-Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 45.4 against 24.1.
  • Qwen3.8-Max (0902) is newer: released 3 Aug 2026, against 17 Mar 2026 for GPT-5.4 mini.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.8-Max (0902) does better for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Head to head

45.4
Intelligence Index
24.1
$3.00
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$1.69
1,000,000
Context window, tokens
400,000

Every fact side by side

Qwen3.8-Max (0902)GPT-5.4 mini
Price per million tokens$2.00 in · $6.00 out$0.75 in · $4.50 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$3.00$1.69
Cheapest host, blended–$1.69 (Azure)
Cached input, per million–$0.075 cached input
Intelligence Index45.424.1
Spring Prompt overall48–
Output speed, tokens a second37–
Context window1,000,000 tokens400,000 tokens
Released3 Aug 2026 (newer)17 Mar 2026
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Product listingsTurning a sparse product feed and photos into listings that can go live 17 of 20 not measured
Decks from an analysisTurning a finished analysis into a deck you could present as it is 11 of 19 not measured
Marketing planningPlanning a year of ad spend without overspending 14 of 19 not measured
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 7 of 164 56 of 164
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 18 of 51 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 17 of 198 71 of 198
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 16 of 188 58 of 188
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 38 of 152 66 of 152
Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) 24 of 24 13 of 23

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3.8-Max (0902)GPT-5.4 mini
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 20 · 72 of 387 measured 1,482 1,447high reasoning
Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 22 · 64 of 163 measured 1,472 1,447high reasoning
Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 16 · 53 of 380 measured 1,484 1,460high reasoning
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 14 · 81 of 243 measured 45.4 24.1xhigh reasoning
GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 15 · 61 of 231 measured 92.8% 87.5%xhigh reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 24 · 82 of 242 measured 43.1% 28.1%xhigh reasoning
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) reported by SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) · 1 result
Correct answers% of questions, higher is better 30 · 60 of 76 measured 47.3%xhigh reasoning 29.4%high reasoning
Show all 17 results (10 more)
MeasureQwen3.8-Max (0902)GPT-5.4 mini
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results
Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 17 · 92 of 385 measured 1,468 1,401high reasoning
Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 20 · 63 of 338 measured 1,513 1,480high reasoning
Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 25 · 77 of 387 measured 1,474 1,434high reasoning
Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 18 · 75 of 386 measured 1,472 1,423high reasoning
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 6 results
Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks, higher is better 5 · 51 of 130 measured 88.8% 59.2%xhigh reasoning
Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks, higher is better 12 · 48 of 112 measured 38.9% 2.0%xhigh reasoning
τ-bench banking% of tasks, higher is better 7 · 39 of 121 measured 47.8% 25.6%xhigh reasoning
Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score, higher is better 10 · 46 of 131 measured 76.2 56.1xhigh reasoning
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 35 · 70 of 233 measured 80.3% 77.0%xhigh reasoning
SciCode% of problems, higher is better 36 · 36 of 113 measured 52.1% 52.1%xhigh reasoning

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.8-Max (0902) better than GPT-5.4 mini?

Pick Qwen3.8-Max (0902) if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 45.4 against 24.1). Pick GPT-5.4 mini if cost matters more: it costs 44% less per token.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GPT-5.4 mini?

GPT-5.4 mini is cheaper: $1.69 against $3.00 per million tokens, 44% less.

Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GPT-5.4 mini?

Qwen3.8-Max (0902) ranks 7 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 56 for GPT-5.4 mini.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GPT-5.4 mini?

Qwen3.8-Max (0902) ranks 17 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 71 for GPT-5.4 mini.

Which is better for writing, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GPT-5.4 mini?

Qwen3.8-Max (0902) ranks 16 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 58 for GPT-5.4 mini.

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GPT-5.4 mini?

Qwen3.8-Max (0902) ranks 38 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 66 for GPT-5.4 mini.

Which is better for speed under pressure, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GPT-5.4 mini?

GPT-5.4 mini ranks 13 of 24 models on sale for good decisions against a real clock (fast chess), against 24 for Qwen3.8-Max (0902).

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GPT-5.4 mini?

Qwen3.8-Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.4 mini.

Run Qwen3.8-Max (0902) and GPT-5.4 mini on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.

Try the playgroundTalk to us