Compare / Qwen3.8-Max (0902) vs GLM-4.7
Qwen3.8-Max (0902) vs GLM-4.7
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Of the 15 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 13 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-13-2e2420e3c5cc). See also Alibaba vs Z.ai, every model from both labs.
Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GLM-4.7? The short answer
Pick Qwen3.8-Max (0902) if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 45.4 against 22.2). Pick GLM-4.7 if cost matters more: it costs 3.3 times less per token.
- GLM-4.7 is cheaper: $0.90 against $3.00 per million tokens, 3.3 times less.
- Qwen3.8-Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 45.4 against 22.2.
- Qwen3.8-Max (0902) is newer: released 3 Aug 2026, against 22 Dec 2025 for GLM-4.7.
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.8-Max (0902) does better for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3.8-Max (0902) | GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $2.00 in · $6.00 out | $0.54 in · $1.98 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $3.00 | $0.90 |
| Cheapest host, blended | – | $0.74 (DeepInfra, FP4) |
| Intelligence Index | 45.4 | 22.2 |
| Spring Prompt overall | 47 | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 37 | – |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 204,800 tokens |
| Released | 3 Aug 2026 (newer) | 22 Dec 2025 |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Developer based in | China | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3.8-Max (0902) | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 20 · 81 of 387 measured | 1,482 | 1,441 |
| Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 22 · 72 of 163 measured | 1,472 | 1,444 |
| Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 16 · 81 of 380 measured | 1,484 | 1,442 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 14 · 92 of 243 measured | 45.4 | 22.2 |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 15 · 73 of 231 measured | 92.8% | 85.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 24 · 88 of 242 measured | 43.1% | 27.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) reported by SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) · 1 result | ||
| Correct answers% of questions, higher is better 30 · 56 of 76 measured | 47.3%xhigh reasoning | 32.2% |
Show all 15 results (8 more)
| Measure | Qwen3.8-Max (0902) | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results | ||
| Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 17 · 88 of 385 measured | 1,468 | 1,405 |
| Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 20 · 100 of 338 measured | 1,513 | 1,449 |
| Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 25 · 88 of 387 measured | 1,474 | 1,425 |
| Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 18 · 84 of 386 measured | 1,472 | 1,416 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks, higher is better 5 · 67 of 130 measured | 88.8% | 45.3% |
| τ-bench banking% of tasks, higher is better 7 · 69 of 121 measured | 47.8% | 12.2% |
| Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score, higher is better 10 · 66 of 131 measured | 76.2 | 45.3 |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 35 · 105 of 233 measured | 80.3% | 71.0% |
Compare them with other models
Quick answers
Is Qwen3.8-Max (0902) better than GLM-4.7?
Pick Qwen3.8-Max (0902) if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 45.4 against 22.2). Pick GLM-4.7 if cost matters more: it costs 3.3 times less per token.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GLM-4.7?
GLM-4.7 is cheaper: $0.90 against $3.00 per million tokens, 3.3 times less.
Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GLM-4.7?
Qwen3.8-Max (0902) ranks 7 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 102 for GLM-4.7.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GLM-4.7?
Qwen3.8-Max (0902) ranks 17 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 80 for GLM-4.7.
Which is better for writing, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GLM-4.7?
Qwen3.8-Max (0902) ranks 16 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 72 for GLM-4.7.
Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GLM-4.7?
Qwen3.8-Max (0902) ranks 38 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 103 for GLM-4.7.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or GLM-4.7?
Qwen3.8-Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens, against 204,800 for GLM-4.7.
Run Qwen3.8-Max (0902) and GLM-4.7 on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.