Compare / Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Kimi K2.6

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Kimi K2.6

20 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Alibaba · profile
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI · profile
Results compared
20
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3 Coder 480B A35BKimi K2.6
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4011,456
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3911,455
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3621,433
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3791,503
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3841,456
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3871,461
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3661,441
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 11.927.0
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 61.8%91.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 4.5%37.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 40.5%76.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 45.7%81.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 18.9%43.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 43.6%95.9%
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 30.9%57.1%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 23.5%41.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 0.0%25.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 33.9%74.5%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 62.4%74.6%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 34.9%70.4%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.