Compare / Qwen3-Max vs Gemma 4 31B
Qwen3-Max vs Gemma 4 31B
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 4 sources that measured both models.
Of the 17 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 13 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-13-2e2420e3c5cc). See also Alibaba vs Google, every model from both labs.
Qwen3-Max or Gemma 4 31B? The short answer
They score about the same, so pick Gemma 4 31B: it costs 7.6 times less per token.
- Gemma 4 31B is cheaper: $0.21 against $1.56 per million tokens, 7.6 times less.
- They score about the same on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (15.6 and 14.7).
- Gemma 4 31B is newer: released 2 Apr 2026, against 24 Sep 2025 for Qwen3-Max.
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3-Max does better for sticking to the facts; Gemma 4 31B for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3-Max | Gemma 4 31B | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.78 in · $3.90 out | $0.14 in · $0.40 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $1.56 | $0.21 |
| Cheapest host, blended | – | $0.15 (DeepInfra, FP4) |
| Intelligence Index | 15.6 | 14.7 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | 43 |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Released | 24 Sep 2025 | 2 Apr 2026 (newer) |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Developer based in | China | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3-Max | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 108 · 65 of 387 measured | 1,423 | 1,453 |
| Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 110 · 66 of 380 measured | 1,419 | 1,449 |
| Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 105 · 74 of 385 measured | 1,393 | 1,420 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 123 · 130 of 243 measured | 15.6 | 14.7 |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 132 · 75 of 231 measured | 76.4% | 85.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 140 · 97 of 242 measured | 11.9% | 23.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) reported by SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) · 1 result | ||
| Correct answers% of questions, higher is better 27 · 74 of 76 measured | 48.7% | 10.4% |
| UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results | ||
| Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 115 · 94 of 230 measured | 38.6 | 43.1channel-thought-prefill reasoning |
| Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 134 · 15 of 230 measured | 23.0% | 5.0% |
| Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 155 · 73 of 230 measured | 0.33 | 0.36channel-thought-prefill reasoning |
Show all 17 results (7 more)
| Measure | Qwen3-Max | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 137 · 42 of 338 measured | 1,417 | 1,498 |
| Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 106 · 49 of 387 measured | 1,413 | 1,453 |
| Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 101 · 63 of 386 measured | 1,405 | 1,435 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results | ||
| IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 118 · 24 of 195 measured | 44.2% | 75.6% |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 154 · 112 of 233 measured | 50.0% | 69.7% |
| Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 91 · 46 of 190 measured | 20.5% | 36.4% |
| τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 79 · 88 of 193 measured | 74.3% | 65.5%no reasoning |
Compare them with other models
Quick answers
Is Qwen3-Max better than Gemma 4 31B?
They score about the same, so pick Gemma 4 31B: it costs 7.6 times less per token.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3-Max or Gemma 4 31B?
Gemma 4 31B is cheaper: $0.21 against $1.56 per million tokens, 7.6 times less.
Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3-Max or Gemma 4 31B?
Gemma 4 31B ranks 101 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 154 for Qwen3-Max.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3-Max or Gemma 4 31B?
Gemma 4 31B ranks 93 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 121 for Qwen3-Max.
Which is better for writing, Qwen3-Max or Gemma 4 31B?
Gemma 4 31B ranks 74 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 99 for Qwen3-Max.
Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3-Max or Gemma 4 31B?
Qwen3-Max ranks 50 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 90 for Gemma 4 31B.
Run Qwen3-Max and Gemma 4 31B on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.