Compare / Qwen3-Max vs GPT-5.6 Terra
Qwen3-Max vs GPT-5.6 Terra
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 18 results on 5 sources that measured both models.
Of the 18 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs OpenAI, every model from both labs.
Qwen3-Max or GPT-5.6 Terra? The short answer
Pick GPT-5.6 Terra if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 42.1 against 15.6). Pick Qwen3-Max if cost matters more: it costs 2.9 times less per token.
- Qwen3-Max is cheaper: $1.56 against $4.50 per million tokens, 2.9 times less.
- GPT-5.6 Terra scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 42.1 against 15.6.
- GPT-5.6 Terra is newer: released 9 Jul 2026, against 24 Sep 2025 for Qwen3-Max.
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3-Max does better for sticking to the facts; GPT-5.6 Terra for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3-Max | GPT-5.6 Terra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.78 in · $3.90 out | $2.00 in · $12.00 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $1.56 | $4.50 |
| Cheapest host, blended | – | $4.50 (Azure) |
| Cached input, per million | – | $0.20 cached input |
| Intelligence Index | 15.6 | 42.1 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | 99 |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Released | 24 Sep 2025 | 9 Jul 2026 (newer) |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Developer based in | China | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3-Max | GPT-5.6 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 108 · 44 of 387 measured | 1,423 | 1,465xhigh reasoning |
| Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 110 · 38 of 380 measured | 1,419 | 1,467xhigh reasoning |
| Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 105 · 65 of 385 measured | 1,393 | 1,426xhigh reasoning |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 123 · 19 of 243 measured | 15.6 | 42.1max reasoning |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 132 · 20 of 231 measured | 76.4% | 92.5%max reasoning |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 140 · 27 of 242 measured | 11.9% | 42.9%max reasoning |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) reported by SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) · 1 result | ||
| Correct answers% of questions, higher is better 27 · 39 of 76 measured | 48.7% | 43.2%max reasoning |
| UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results | ||
| Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 115 · 44 of 230 measured | 38.6 | 60.4high reasoning |
| Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 134 · 129 of 230 measured | 23.0% | 22.0%xhigh reasoning |
| Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 155 · 18 of 230 measured | 0.33 | 0.39xhigh reasoning |
| Vending-Bench 2 reported by Vending-Bench 2 · 1 result | ||
| Money after a yearUS dollars, higher is better 52 · 11 of 58 measured | $71.57 | $7,343 |
Show all 18 results (7 more)
| Measure | Qwen3-Max | GPT-5.6 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 137 · 30 of 338 measured | 1,417 | 1,504xhigh reasoning |
| Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 106 · 39 of 387 measured | 1,413 | 1,461xhigh reasoning |
| Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 101 · 54 of 386 measured | 1,405 | 1,445xhigh reasoning |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results | ||
| IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 118 · 47 of 195 measured | 44.2% | 71.2%max reasoning |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 154 · 15 of 233 measured | 50.0% | 83.0%max reasoning |
| Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 91 · 2 of 190 measured | 20.5% | 62.9%xhigh reasoning |
| τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 79 · 55 of 193 measured | 74.3% | 86.3%max reasoning |
Compare them with other models
Quick answers
Is Qwen3-Max better than GPT-5.6 Terra?
Pick GPT-5.6 Terra if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 42.1 against 15.6). Pick Qwen3-Max if cost matters more: it costs 2.9 times less per token.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3-Max or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Qwen3-Max is cheaper: $1.56 against $4.50 per million tokens, 2.9 times less.
Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3-Max or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra ranks 16 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 154 for Qwen3-Max.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3-Max or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra ranks 21 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 121 for Qwen3-Max.
Which is better for writing, Qwen3-Max or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra ranks 39 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 99 for Qwen3-Max.
Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3-Max or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Qwen3-Max ranks 50 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 51 for GPT-5.6 Terra.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3-Max or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3-Max.
Run Qwen3-Max and GPT-5.6 Terra on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.