Compare / Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Claude Opus 4.7

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Claude Opus 4.7

16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Alibaba · profile
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingClaude Opus 4.7
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3921,508
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3391,488
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4391,535
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3831,503
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3951,502
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3651,496
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 13.440.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 77.2%91.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 11.9%42.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 56.5%58.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 63.7%78.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 11.4%54.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 54.1%88.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 30.0%1.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.340.41
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 32.361.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.