Compare / Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

15 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Alibaba · profile
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3921,423
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3391,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3831,420
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3951,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3651,411
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 13.414.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 77.2%79.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 11.9%16.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 56.5%57.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 63.7%69.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 11.4%31.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 54.1%37.1%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 30.0%32.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.340.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 32.354.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.