Compare / qwen3-vl-4b-thinking vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
qwen3-vl-4b-thinking vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
10 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | qwen3-vl-4b-thinking | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 7.00 | 29.7 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 49.4% | 94.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 4.6% | 47.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 36.6% | 77.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 21.3% | 82.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 1.5% | 53.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 15.5% | 95.6% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 79.0% | 19.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.33 | 0.34 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 17.4 | 72.2 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.