Compare / claude-3-opus-20240229 vs GLM 5.1

claude-3-opus-20240229 vs GLM 5.1

10 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

claude-3-opus-20240229
Anthropic · profile
GLM 5.1
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
10
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricclaude-3-opus-20240229GLM 5.1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3051,465
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2881,448
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3181,495
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3141,460
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3221,465
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3161,453
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 12.6%34.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 20.0%9.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.38
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 54.361.7

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.