Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · profile
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5.1DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4851,423
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4841,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4971,420
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,411
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 81.643.5
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 53.414.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 93.7%79.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 59.1%16.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 85.3%69.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 63.1%38.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 91.4%44.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 55.1%0.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 47.2%21.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 3.0%32.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.430.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 63.954.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.