Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 4 31B
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 4 31B
21 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,493 | 1,445 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,501 | 1,450 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,485 | 1,449 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,484 | 1,419 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,516 | 1,499 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,497 | 1,453 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,501 | 1,453 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,496 | 1,435 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 81.6 | 43.4 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 53.4 | 14.7 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 93.7% | 85.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 59.1% | 23.6% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 85.3% | 69.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 63.1% | 45.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 91.4% | 43.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 55.1% | 0.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 47.2% | 14.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 70.8% | 10.4% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 3.0% | 5.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.43 | 0.36 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 63.9 | 43.1 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.