Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2

23 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · profile
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta · profile
Results compared
23
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5.1Muse Spark 1.2
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 68.6%36.4%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate 0.17-0.05
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate 0.32-0.12
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate 0.08-0.05
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate 0.000.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,484
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4851,519
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4841,448
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5161,502
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4971,475
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,496
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,472
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 81.672.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 53.439.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 93.7%90.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 59.1%45.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 85.3%79.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 63.1%57.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 91.4%80.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 55.1%7.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 47.2%34.8%
GDP.pdfreportedProfessional document tasks% of rubric 29.6%16.0%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 70.8%60.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.