Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs Mistral Large 4
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Mistral Large 4
60 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Cost per gameUS dollars | $0.38 | $0.0082 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Games lost on time% of games | 37.5% | 0.0% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Invalid moves% of moves | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Ladder Eloladder Elo | 358 | 555 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Median move timemilliseconds | 5.4 s | 0.8 s |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 0.0% | 1.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Claims to check% of products | 0.0% | 3.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 97.2% | 95.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 1.8% | 3.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 13.7% | 10.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 5.4% | 1.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 83.9% | 80.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 3.86 | 3.69 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 14.9% | 17.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel compliance% of products | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 0.0% | 3.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Claims to check% of products | 0.6% | 0.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Conflicts caught% of conflicts | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 97.6% | 96.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Cost per productUS dollars | $0.0991 | $0.0033 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Decision accuracy% of decisions | 95.9% | 93.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Field accuracy% of missing fields | 94.7% | 94.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Invented values% of filled values | 0.7% | 3.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 1.8% | 4.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 46.4% | 39.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 26.8% | 10.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 1.23 | 0.91 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 48.8% | 33.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 11.9% | 19.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 2.4% | 1.2% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Accurate decks% of tasks | 66.7% | 0.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Caveat dropped% of tasks | 0.0% | 16.7% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Clean layout% of tasks | 33.3% | 33.3% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Cost per deckUS dollars | $0.81 | $0.0148 |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Deck ratingrating | 1,300 | 515 |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Design quality% of the maximum | 66.6% | 30.5% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Draft figure quoted% of tasks | 33.3% | 16.7% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Findings missing% of tasks | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Head-to-head win rate% of comparisons | 76.8% | 10.7% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Layout defects% of tasks | 66.7% | 66.7% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Misleading metric used% of tasks | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Presentable decks% of tasks | 33.3% | 0.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Recommendation late or wrong% of tasks | 0.0% | 83.3% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Slides needing work% of tasks | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of tasks | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported numbers% of tasks | 0.0% | 33.3% |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Audience scorescore out of 100 | 67.7 | 55.8 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Business scorescore out of 100 | 52.3 | 34.2 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Consistency scorescore out of 100 | 33.3 | 16.7 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Contribution profitsimulated US dollars | $965,271 | $533,401 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Cost of a runUS dollars | $2.49 | $0.0657 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Months over budgetmonths of 12 | 0 | 0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Overall scorescore out of 100 | 51.5 | 37.0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Planning scorescore out of 100 | 54.6 | 55.0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Return on ad spendprofit per $1 spent | $0.64 | $0.45 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.