Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5.4 Nano
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5.1GPT-5.4 Nano
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,418
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4851,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4841,335
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5161,438
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4971,387
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,401
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,362
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 81.656.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 53.420.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 93.7%81.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 59.1%28.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 85.3%76.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 63.1%47.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 91.4%60.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 55.1%0.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 47.2%27.4%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 70.8%11.7%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.