Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
37 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|---|
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Claims to check% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 97.2% | 98.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 1.8% | 5.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 13.7% | 72.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 5.4% | 67.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 83.9% | 3.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 3.86 | 0.07 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 14.9% | 19.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel compliance% of products | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Claims to check% of products | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Conflicts caught% of conflicts | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 97.6% | 98.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Cost per productUS dollars | $0.0991 | $0.0084 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Decision accuracy% of decisions | 95.9% | 98.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Field accuracy% of missing fields | 94.7% | 94.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Invented values% of filled values | 0.7% | 2.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 1.8% | 4.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 46.4% | 78.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 26.8% | 75.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 48.8% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 11.9% | 16.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 2.4% | 1.8% |
| APEX-Agentsreported | Tasks passed% of tasks | 68.6% | 60.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 53.4 | 51.8 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 59.1% | 52.9% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 85.3% | 84.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 63.1% | 55.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 55.1% | 56.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 70.8% | 73.9% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.