Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs Inkling Small

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Inkling Small

12 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · profile
Inkling Small
Thinkingmachines · profile
Results compared
12
Shared sources
2
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5.1Inkling Small
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate 0.17-0.21
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate 0.32-0.21
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate 0.08-0.12
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate 0.00-0.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,425
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4851,408
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4841,313
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5161,445
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4971,393
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,344
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 70.8%19.1%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.