Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs grok-4-fast-reasoning

Claude Fable 5.1 vs grok-4-fast-reasoning

14 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · profile
grok-4-fast-reasoning
xAI · profile
Results compared
14
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5.1grok-4-fast-reasoning
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4851,403
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4841,383
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5161,421
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4971,389
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,388
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 53.417.9
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 93.7%84.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 59.1%19.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 85.3%73.7%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 3.0%23.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.430.33
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 63.953.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.