Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5V Turbo
Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5V Turbo
42 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 | GLM 5V Turbo |
|---|---|---|---|
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Claims to check% of products | 0.0% | 28.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 97.2% | 16.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 82.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 13.7% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 5.4% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 83.9% | 17.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 3.86 | 1.31 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 14.9% | 3.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 1.8% | 1.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel compliance% of products | 100.0% | 98.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 0.0% | 1.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Claims to check% of products | 0.6% | 11.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Conflicts caught% of conflicts | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 97.6% | 63.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Cost per productUS dollars | $0.0991 | $0.0070 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Decision accuracy% of decisions | 95.9% | 61.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 32.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Field accuracy% of missing fields | 94.7% | 59.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Invented values% of filled values | 0.7% | 3.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 1.8% | 5.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 46.4% | 10.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 26.8% | 1.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 1.23 | 2.49 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 48.8% | 55.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 11.9% | 13.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 2.4% | 1.2% |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,493 | 1,400 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,501 | 1,440 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,485 | 1,440 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,484 | 1,403 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,516 | 1,462 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,497 | 1,423 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,501 | 1,433 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,496 | 1,412 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 53.4 | 23.5 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 93.7% | 80.9% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 59.1% | 17.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 85.3% | 70.3% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.