Compare / Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7

20 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic · profile
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
20
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.7
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4991,494
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,2291,212
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4831,477
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5031,508
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5011,488
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5501,535
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5091,503
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5041,502
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5081,496
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 81.0%69.7%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 70.6%48.5%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 62.5%56.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 84.2%81.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 95.8%81.6%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 91.9%80.8%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 28.9%24.7%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 39.7%40.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 2.0%1.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.41
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 74.261.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.