Compare / Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V3.2

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V3.2

16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic · profile
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5DeepSeek V3.2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4831,437
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5031,423
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5011,400
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5501,453
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5091,420
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5041,425
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5081,410
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 81.0%45.7%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 70.6%27.9%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 62.5%25.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 84.2%50.3%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 95.8%71.6%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 91.9%53.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 2.0%26.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 74.257.3

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.