Compare / Claude Fable 5 vs Gemma 4 31B

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemma 4 31B

24 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic · profile
Gemma 4 31B
Google · profile
Results compared
24
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5Gemma 4 31B
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4991,445
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4831,450
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5031,449
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5011,419
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5501,499
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5091,453
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5041,453
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5081,435
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 76.543.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 49.614.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.6%85.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 55.5%23.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 63.5%75.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 82.3%69.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 61.0%45.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 84.6%43.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 42.4%0.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 62.9%36.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 38.1%14.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 98.5%65.5%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 70.7%10.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 2.0%5.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 74.243.1

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.