Compare / Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 4.7

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 4.7

16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic · profile
GLM 4.7
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5GLM 4.7
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4831,444
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5031,442
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5011,404
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5501,449
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5091,425
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5041,441
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5081,416
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 81.0%42.3%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 70.6%22.1%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 62.5%12.5%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 84.2%53.9%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 95.8%73.4%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 91.9%49.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 2.0%28.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.38
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 74.247.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.