Compare / Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

19 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5.4 Nano
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
19
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.4 Nano
BulletBenchmeasured by usCost per gameUS dollars $0.0163$0.0050
BulletBenchmeasured by usGames lost on time% of games 25.0%66.7%
BulletBenchmeasured by usInvalid moves% of moves 0.3%3.1%
BulletBenchmeasured by usLadder Eloladder Elo 44533
BulletBenchmeasured by usMedian move timemilliseconds 1.2 s1.1 s
BulletBenchmeasured by usCost per gameUS dollars $0.0095$0.0025
BulletBenchmeasured by usGames lost on time% of games 83.3%75.0%
BulletBenchmeasured by usInvalid moves% of moves 0.0%4.0%
BulletBenchmeasured by usLadder Eloladder Elo 33197
BulletBenchmeasured by usMedian move timemilliseconds 1.3 s1.0 s
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4181,418
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4201,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3871,335
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4521,438
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4151,387
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4141,401
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3991,362
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.5%100.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 9.8%3.1%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.