Compare / Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 Luna

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 Luna

54 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic · profile
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
54
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-6 Luna
BulletBenchmeasured by usCost per gameUS dollars $0.0318$0.0072
BulletBenchmeasured by usGames lost on time% of games 0.0%50.0%
BulletBenchmeasured by usInvalid moves% of moves 0.9%0.0%
BulletBenchmeasured by usLadder Eloladder Elo 491557
BulletBenchmeasured by usMedian move timemilliseconds 1.3 s7.0 s
BulletBenchmeasured by usCost per gameUS dollars $0.0163$0.0016
BulletBenchmeasured by usGames lost on time% of games 25.0%50.0%
BulletBenchmeasured by usInvalid moves% of moves 0.3%0.0%
BulletBenchmeasured by usLadder Eloladder Elo 445249
BulletBenchmeasured by usMedian move timemilliseconds 1.2 s1.5 s
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 22.6%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 94.2%97.8%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 6.5%10.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 1.2%69.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 0.0%55.4%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 7.300.32
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 95.8%7.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 51.2%19.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 6.5%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel compliance% of products 92.3%100.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 7.7%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usConflicts caught% of conflicts 100.0%100.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 94.9%97.3%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usCost per productUS dollars $0.0061$0.0005
CatalogBenchmeasured by usDecision accuracy% of decisions 89.3%97.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usField accuracy% of missing fields 93.7%93.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usInvented values% of filled values 6.2%1.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 8.9%10.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 7.7%66.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 1.8%55.4%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 80.4%9.5%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 3.500.30
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 48.2%18.4%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 7.7%1.8%
ROASBenchmeasured by usAudience scorescore out of 100 30.968.2
ROASBenchmeasured by usBusiness scorescore out of 100 7.354.8
ROASBenchmeasured by usConsistency scorescore out of 100 8.735.8
ROASBenchmeasured by usContribution profitsimulated US dollars −$205,001$738,878
ROASBenchmeasured by usCost of a runUS dollars $0.0298$0.0142
ROASBenchmeasured by usMonths over budgetmonths of 12 20
ROASBenchmeasured by usOverall scorescore out of 100 17.553.4
ROASBenchmeasured by usPlanning scorescore out of 100 54.454.8
ROASBenchmeasured by usReturn on ad spendprofit per $1 spent −$0.21$0.66
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4181,422
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4201,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3871,403
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4521,505
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4151,443
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4141,442
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3991,415

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.