Compare / Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 5.2

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 5.2

24 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic · profile
GLM 5.2
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
24
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricClaude Haiku 4.5GLM 5.2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4181,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4201,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3871,455
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4521,500
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4151,470
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4141,476
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3991,459
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 43.968.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 16.933.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 67.2%89.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 10.4%41.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 54.3%73.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 74.3%78.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 42.2%51.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 44.2%77.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%1.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 27.3%50.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 9.3%34.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 54.7%99.1%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 13.2%34.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 6.0%12.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.390.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 52.267.0
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $458.89$8,313.78

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.