Compare / Claude Opus 4.1 vs Kimi K2 0711
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Kimi K2 0711
16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Opus 4.1 | Kimi K2 0711 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,447 | 1,409 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,445 | 1,371 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,482 | 1,417 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,458 | 1,381 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,450 | 1,418 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,446 | 1,375 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 22.8 | 12.7 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 80.9% | 76.6% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 12.5% | 7.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 55.4% | 41.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 76.0% | 53.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 34.3% | 15.9% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 71.4% | 61.1% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 3.0% | 22.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.38 | 0.29 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 69.9 | 52.5 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.