Compare / Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3
Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3
11 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,472 | 1,350 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,469 | 1,349 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,503 | 1,348 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,483 | 1,343 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,474 | 1,358 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,467 | 1,356 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 3.0% | 17.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.39 | 0.37 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 70.4 | 43.2 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 98.7% | 97.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 10.9% | 6.1% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.