Compare / Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

15 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic · profile
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4721,423
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4691,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4831,420
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4741,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4671,411
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 29.114.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 86.6%79.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 30.1%16.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 58.0%57.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.3%69.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 47.0%31.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 89.5%37.1%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 3.0%32.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.390.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 70.454.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.