Compare / Claude Opus 4.5 vs llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct-fp8
Claude Opus 4.5 vs llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct-fp8
10 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 | llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct-fp8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 90.8% | 56.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 73.8% | 18.9% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 68.4% | 20.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 77.5% | 37.3% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 68.8% | 100.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 89.7% | 88.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 79.8% | 73.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 84.5% | 28.0% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 98.7% | 100.0% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 10.9% | 8.2% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.