Compare / Claude Opus 4.5 vs Kimi K2.6

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Kimi K2.6

19 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic · profile
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI · profile
Results compared
19
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.5Kimi K2.6
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4651,450
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4591,456
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4721,455
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4691,433
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5031,503
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4831,456
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4741,461
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4671,441
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 60.6%57.1%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 41.2%41.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 37.5%25.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 69.1%74.5%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 76.6%74.6%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 78.5%70.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 3.0%18.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.390.35
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 70.464.4
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 98.7%99.7%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 10.9%10.8%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.