Compare / Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-4.1 Mini
Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-4.1 Mini
14 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,472 | 1,379 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,469 | 1,349 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,503 | 1,384 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,483 | 1,373 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,474 | 1,383 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,467 | 1,361 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 90.8% | 81.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 73.8% | 26.9% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 68.4% | 34.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 77.5% | 50.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 68.8% | 87.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 89.7% | 84.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 79.8% | 74.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 84.5% | 57.0% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.