Compare / Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

20 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
20
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.5GPT-5.6 Terra
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4651,477
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4591,467
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4721,466
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4691,428
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5031,504
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4831,462
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4741,465
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4671,445
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 29.142.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 86.6%92.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 30.1%42.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 58.0%71.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.3%83.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 47.0%62.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 89.5%86.3%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 45.7%43.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 3.0%22.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.390.39
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 70.460.4
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $4,967.06$7,343.21

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.