Compare / Claude Opus 4.5 vs grok-4.20-0309-reasoning

Claude Opus 4.5 vs grok-4.20-0309-reasoning

11 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic · profile
grok-4.20-0309-reasoning
xAI · profile
Results compared
11
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.5grok-4.20-0309-reasoning
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 29.125.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 86.6%88.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 30.1%32.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 58.0%82.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.3%67.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 47.0%40.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 89.5%96.5%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 45.7%30.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 3.0%46.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.390.33
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 70.455.3

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.