Compare / Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

20 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic · profile
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
20
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.6Claude Sonnet 4.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4951,449
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,2231,175
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4941,449
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5011,461
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5011,454
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5471,498
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5131,464
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5051,457
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5001,454
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 66.7%53.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 41.8%36.8%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 56.2%12.5%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 80.0%72.7%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 76.8%74.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 78.8%68.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 3.0%5.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.41
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 70.966.9
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.8%95.6%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 12.2%12.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.