Compare / Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

15 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic · profile
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.6DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5011,423
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5011,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5131,420
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5051,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5001,411
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 31.914.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 89.6%79.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 39.9%16.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 53.1%57.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.0%69.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 48.5%31.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 92.1%37.1%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 3.0%32.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 70.954.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.