Compare / Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

10 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic · profile
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI · profile
Results compared
10
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.6Kimi K2.7 Code
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 46.3%37.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 31.925.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 89.6%89.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 39.9%35.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 53.1%63.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.0%79.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 48.5%44.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 92.1%90.1%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 47.0%36.5%
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $8,017.59$5,082.94

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.