Compare / Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 Mini

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 Mini

17 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5.4 Mini
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5.4 Mini
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4941,447
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5011,460
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5011,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5471,480
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5131,434
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5051,447
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5001,424
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 31.924.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 89.6%87.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 39.9%28.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 53.1%73.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.0%77.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 48.5%52.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 92.1%83.3%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 47.0%29.4%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.8%100.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 12.2%5.5%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.