Compare / Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 4.5

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 4.5

16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic · profile
GLM 4.5
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.6GLM 4.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5011,412
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5011,372
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5471,444
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5131,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5051,411
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5001,382
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 31.912.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 89.6%78.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 39.9%13.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 53.1%44.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.0%52.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 48.5%22.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 92.1%43.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 3.0%13.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 70.957.3

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.