Compare / Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

12 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic · profile
GLM 5.3 Flash
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
12
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.6GLM 5.3 Flash
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 46.3%52.8%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4941,467
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5011,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5011,433
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5471,510
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5131,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5051,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5001,450
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 31.941.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 89.6%91.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 39.9%39.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.0%80.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.