Compare / Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V3.2

Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V3.2

18 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V3.2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4771,437
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5081,423
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4881,400
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5351,453
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5031,420
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5021,425
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,410
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 69.7%45.7%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 48.5%27.9%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 56.2%25.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 81.2%50.3%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 81.6%71.6%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 80.8%53.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 1.0%26.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 61.457.3
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 98.0%92.6%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 12.0%6.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.