Compare / Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.2

17 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.7Muse Spark 1.2
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 49.2%36.4%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4771,484
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5081,519
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4881,448
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5351,502
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5031,475
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5021,496
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,472
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 73.672.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 40.739.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 91.4%90.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 42.3%45.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.7%79.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 83.1%80.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 34.6%34.8%
GDP.pdfreportedProfessional document tasks% of rubric 21.0%16.0%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 51.7%60.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.