Compare / Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K3

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K3

20 results from 7 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI · profile
Results compared
20
Shared sources
7
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.7Kimi K3
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 49.2%50.6%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4771,472
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5081,489
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4881,458
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5351,533
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5031,486
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5021,488
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,475
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 73.676.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 40.743.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 91.4%93.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 42.3%46.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.7%88.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 83.1%85.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 34.6%46.0%
GDP.pdfreportedProfessional document tasks% of rubric 21.0%19.0%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 51.7%50.6%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 24.7%17.5%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 40.2%37.1%
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $10,936.76$5,165.03

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.