Compare / Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol
16 results from 7 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agentsreported | Tasks passed% of tasks | 49.2% | 54.3% |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,477 | 1,424 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,508 | 1,465 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,488 | 1,451 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,535 | 1,507 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,503 | 1,447 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,502 | 1,457 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,496 | 1,440 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 40.7 | 47.6 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 42.3% | 47.9% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 78.7% | 83.7% |
| GDP.pdfreported | Professional document tasks% of rubric | 21.0% | 26.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 51.7% | 60.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 98.0% | 100.0% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 12.0% | 6.5% |
| Vending-Bench 2reported | Money after a yearUS dollars | $10,936.76 | $14,427.85 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.