Compare / Claude Opus 4.7 vs Inkling

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Inkling

11 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
Inkling
Thinkingmachines · profile
Results compared
11
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.7Inkling
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 49.2%33.8%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4771,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5081,444
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4881,384
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5351,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5031,427
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5021,442
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,403
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 51.7%40.3%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 24.7%11.3%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 40.2%25.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.