Compare / Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 4.20

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 4.20

10 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
Grok 4.20
xAI · profile
Results compared
10
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.7Grok 4.20
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 40.725.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 91.4%91.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 42.3%34.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 58.6%81.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.7%69.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 54.5%37.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 88.6%93.0%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 24.7%8.2%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 40.2%18.0%
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $10,936.76$4,662.85

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.