Compare / Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5.3

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5.3

17 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
GLM 5.3
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.7GLM 5.3
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 49.2%56.6%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4771,468
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5081,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4881,456
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5351,516
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5031,480
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5021,480
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,470
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 73.674.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 40.744.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 91.4%91.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 42.3%42.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.7%79.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 83.1%83.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 34.6%50.3%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 51.7%41.0%
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $10,936.76$8,163.61

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.