Compare / Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

16 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
GLM 5.3 Flash
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.7GLM 5.3 Flash
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 49.2%52.8%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4771,467
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5081,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4881,433
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5351,510
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5031,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5021,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,450
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 73.671.5
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 40.741.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 91.4%91.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 42.3%39.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.7%80.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 83.1%84.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 34.6%47.2%
GDP.pdfreportedProfessional document tasks% of rubric 21.0%14.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.