Compare / Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V3.1

Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V3.1

16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · profile
DeepSeek V3.1
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.8DeepSeek V3.1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4901,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4671,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5251,432
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4911,416
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4801,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4741,407
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 41.813.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.0%77.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 48.7%14.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 62.2%41.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.7%56.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 58.3%25.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 94.4%37.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 6.0%30.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.400.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 65.951.9

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.