Compare / Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.1

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.1

24 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5.1
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
24
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4861,416
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,1951,183
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4691,459
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4901,448
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4671,428
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5251,482
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4911,450
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4801,456
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4741,437
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 74.349.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 41.824.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.0%87.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 48.7%28.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 62.2%72.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.7%80.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 84.6%52.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 58.3%45.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 34.2%15.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 94.4%81.9%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 53.0%48.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 6.0%113.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.400.38
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 65.955.8
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $5,787.43$1,473.43

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.