Compare / Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.4 Mini

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.4 Mini

20 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5.4 Mini
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
20
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.4 Mini
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4691,447
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4901,460
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4671,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5251,480
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4911,434
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4801,447
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4741,424
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 74.356.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 41.824.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.0%87.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 48.7%28.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 62.2%73.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.7%77.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 54.4%52.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 84.6%59.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 21.7%2.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 58.3%52.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 34.2%25.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 94.4%83.3%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 53.0%29.4%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.